Friday, February 26, 2010

The Sad Part Of Too Smart

Ever think that maybe we're too smart for our own good?

By smart I mean too "sophisticated", or too wise or too jaded. Or all of these. The thought occurred to me when I was mindlessly spinning through the interwebs looking at paintings and photographs by artists of some renown.

I came across a painting that brought back something to mind I hadn't thought about in a very long time. I had always told myself... of all the famous, iconic things this painter has done, THIS - lesser known piece - will always be my favorite.

I think I made that little declaration to myself somewhere in high school, right at that time you start to realize that - this is real... the rest of my life is coming... and all the naive yet frightening questions about the future you ask yourself begin to form. And what's more - for the first time in your life - you can verbalize them. That time when your creative mind, collecting what little you know and marching on with the fresh energy of your youth, sees many possibilities and approaches. I saw this painting in a book and decided right then and there that this almost unknown work was the real masterpiece the world had missed. Of course it wasn't all that unknown. And though the artist is an icon and so many of his paintings are forever emplanted permanently into the culture, I decided (in the hubris only an 18-year-old can muster) the experts blew the call. Or, at least, the same old things the world considers his greatest paintings - made mundane to my mind by the sheer expected usualness of their choices - were not as great as this one. And - though certainly it isn't UNknown, to be sure, the world missed calling THIS ONE the greatest he had done. Yeah I was a piece of work at 18. You should have known me.

I admit I'd forgotten that declaration I made - almost forty years ago now. This declaration that was part of what informed my outlook and my worldview that I'd left so casually on the wayside after such a pompous announcement.

Well... I saw the painting again tonight and felt that old starlight inside. And the first thing I wanted to do was share it with everyone. Silly.

But then the scourge of the modern reared its head and I thought - well this is pretty much nothing at all. It's Van Gogh - and Van Gogh is a damned cliche to so many now. The initial rush is over. People have moved on. The internet changed everything. People don't even READ the same way anymore, why should anyone care about this?

It was like - way to go RW. Dredge this thing up and watch the eyes roll. He's at it again. That's old news. It's been done. FAIL.

Which is when I sat down and began to type... "Ever think that maybe we're too smart for our own good? The line that begins this post. Because I would hate to think we lose this ability to enjoy something so old school as a silly painting because of our rushed time frames, our apps, our devices, our social networks. Why - when I go to an art gallery (and Chicago has one of the best) I get all huffed about how quickly everybody walks through.

Oh well. I'm a damned old fool to be sure.

But anyway, in case you're not so wise and jaded... this is the one I'm talking about. I purposely shrunk it so you'd have to click it in order to really see it (I think that's how it works). And maybe if you do you will see what I see. The lesser known Van Gogh masterpiece. To my feeble brain, better than any of the standards.

Indulge a fool.

The Red Vineyard.

10 Comments:

At February 26, 2010 1:00 AM , Blogger Dave2 said...

Given my love of Van Gogh, I'd have to agree it's a beautiful painting. Though nothing approached his Starry Night for me, which is one of my most favorite paintings by any artist. :-)

 
At February 26, 2010 7:16 AM , Blogger B.E. Earl said...

Nope. You're wrong.

(See what I did there? Talk about hubris!)

 
At February 26, 2010 10:05 AM , Blogger Brian said...

Is that one in the museum in Amsterdam? If it is, I don't remember seeing it there, though there are a few explanations for that...

Anyway, yes it is stunning. Particularly the light over the water.

I don't know if I have a favorite Van Gogh. Lately, I've been really drawn to another Dutch guy, in large part because of that nice little picture gallery you have in Chicago.

 
At February 26, 2010 10:36 AM , Blogger RW said...

It's at the Pushkin in Moscow.

 
At February 26, 2010 10:54 AM , Blogger sybil law said...

Even though Van Gogh IS everywhere, it seems, I still love him. How can you not? He was my favorite artist when I was in 8th grade - and I painted a small, round box with lilies in "Van Gogh style" - and my kid uses that box to hold her trinkets.
I love that painting.

 
At February 26, 2010 9:26 PM , Blogger Gino said...

either i'm a fucking neanderthal, or you are all too sophisticated for your own good.

never was one for art appreciation, but i admit to being drawn to Dali's work.
but i cant explain the why of it.

back when i was 15, in FL, i saw some dali'esque print in a gallery. it wasnt dali, but somebody who did the same type of stuff.

i'll never remember the artist's name either..
i've loved that painting ever since, and havent seen it since, but would recognise it again if i ever did.

 
At February 28, 2010 10:57 AM , Anonymous Capricorn Cringe said...

I've never seen this piece before - it's beautiful.

A few years ago, I came across a painting that stopped me in my tracks. It just spoke to me. It was for sale, but way out of my price range. The best I could do was take a picture of it.

Here's a link
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1064/1351138938_1ae78947a6_o.jpg

 
At March 2, 2010 9:46 AM , Blogger Candy's daily Dandy said...

I find nothing but admiration for anyone who can find passion in Art and be moved by it's quiet beauty.

 
At March 3, 2010 8:16 AM , Blogger Faiqa said...

It's beautiful. It makes me want to paint poster signs reading "Grape Pickers Unite!" Seriously, who does that guy on the oxcart think he is, he better have some cold water and nutritious snacks in there for those people... But, yes, it is beautiful.

I think the fear of being trite whether in terms of art, science or language is a huge stifle on creativity. Being "new" or "different" doesn't mean it's good. For me, good is good because it is timeless and timelessness carries a certain aspect of redoing what has been done already. I believe that the static truths exist, even though they may be few, and good art or writing reminds us of them.

So, thanks for posting this. You Van Gogh on with your bad self.

 
At March 3, 2010 9:09 AM , Blogger Kono said...

i try to retain the wild eyed wonder of youth, you're right, society has jaded many but only if you let it, i can look at this painting all day, like when i went to see an exhibit by Little Piet Mondrian, known for his more linear and de stijl like paintings that everyone crowded around i stood and gazed at a painting of windmills for over an hour in some sort of ecstatic joy at how beautiful it was, two years ago or so, i was 37 or 38, to this day it sticks with me, i don't ever plan on losing the childlike wonder, besides what are experts and critics anyway but those who had no talent or were afraid to try.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home